If the election of '06 was a shot fired across the GOP's bow, the '08 election was right in their wheelhouse. Neo-conservative (big-government authoritarian) Republican John McCain got stomped by Democrat Barack Obama electorally, 163 to 364. The popular vote was slightly less one-sided, with Obama getting 53% and McCain getting 46%. The Democrats picked up 6 seats in the U.S. Senate and picked up 17 seats in the U.S. House. At the end of it all, the Senate had 57 Democrat seats (only 3 seats short of a filibuster-proof majority) to 40 Republican seats. The House now has 252 Dems and 173 Republicans.
As a one-time stalwart Republican, when I surveyed the wreckage of the GOP, I felt like an immigrant to the U.S. seeing his war-torn former country on CNN, bombed and flattened. I felt sad for my friends who didn't make it out, but glad that I left when I did.
I didn't shed too many tears though, because the GOP brought this shellacking on themselves. Many people like myself fought in the trenches to put the GOP in power in the 1990's. We sent them to DC with a simple mandate: "Cut government." That included cutting taxes, spending, regulation and intrusiveness. The Republican-controlled federal government did the exact opposite of those things. (I know they cut taxes somewhat. But they didn't even make those cuts permanent and they increased spending and debt so much that essentially they just delayed paying those taxes rather than eliminating them.)
In essence, once the Republicans were firmly in power, they governed like Democrats. Advocates of smaller, less intrusive federal government suddenly found themselves out in the cold. But, as the last two election cycles showed, the American people will choose real Democrats over wannabe-Democrats every time. The neo-conservative plan to out-Democrat the Democrats resulted in an electoral train wreck.
Supporters of smaller government now have four options:
- We can help the GOP rebuild their party, and try to get it to focus on limited government fundamentals. This is essentially what Ron Paul's Campaign for Liberty is about.
- We can join the Democrats and take whatever reforms we can get.
- We can become detached from the political process, hunker down and hope that the big-government Panzers roll past without crushing us.
- We can try to build the Libertarian Party or Constitution Party into a major party able to challenge the Demublicans for control.
I've thrown in with the merry band of Libertarians, so it's probably obvious that I support the last option. Paleo-conservatives, libertarians, and constitutionalists gave the Republican Party a fair chance to advance limited government principles. The GOP betrayed that trust. May it rest in peace.
Apparently some in the GOP recognize where their problems lie and want to choose Option #1 from my list.
ReplyDeleteFrom the Mason City Globe-Gazette:
"Local Republican Party leaders may not agree on how, but they all believe the party needs to make changes if it’s going to succeed in the future.
“I think there are a lot of things that need to be addressed,” said former Iowa Rep. Gary Blodgett of Clear Lake in light of Tuesday’s Democratic landslide.
"Blodgett was one of several Republicans who said the party needs to get back to its core principles.
"Those include a sound economy, holding the line on taxes, less government, promotion of individual freedom and individual initiative, Blodgett said. [...]"
"Bill Salier of Nora Springs, who ran in an unsuccessful Republican primary race for the U.S. Senate in 2002, said after the party succeeded in winning the presidency in 2004 it began “a quest to retain power” and did not stick to its core values.
"'Don’t say you’re the party of limited government and then stuff a $700 billion bailout package down our throats,' Salier said."
I always liked that Bill Salier. Not everyone gets it though. John Laflen, Republican County chairman for Winnebago County, said “I think we need to move away from being a Conservative Party to being a Progressive Party.”
In other words, keep trying to out-Democrat the Democrats. Sigh. You can read the entire article at: http://www.globegazette.com/articles/2008/11/07/news/local/doc4913d2764ab0e490624422.txt