Monday, January 2, 2017
I'VE MOVED!
New for 2017, Cold Hard Cashner has a new web address: https://coldhardcashner.blog Please update your web browser accordingly. Thanks and happy New Year!
Friday, November 18, 2016
The Parties' Platforms on Guns
Here is what the three noteworthy political parties say about Second Amendment issues in their platforms.
Libertarian Party
1.9 Self-Defense
"The only legitimate use of force is in defense of individual rights—life, liberty, and justly acquired property—against aggression. This right inheres in the individual, who may agree to be aided by any other individual or group. We affirm the individual right recognized by the Second Amendment to keep and bear arms, and oppose the prosecution of individuals for exercising their rights of self-defense. Private property owners should be free to establish their own conditions regarding the presence of personal defense weapons on their own property. We oppose all laws at any level of government restricting, registering, or monitoring the ownership, manufacture, or transfer of firearms or ammunition."
Republican Party of Iowa
"4. We strongly believe in the constitutionally protected natural right of individuals to keep and bear arms, as recognized and protected by the Second Amendment, and we support the repeal of existing laws that infringe upon those rights. We support the addition of “stand your ground” and “castle doctrine” provisions to Iowa law."
Democratic Party of Iowa
Gun Safety
We support:
248. President Obama's executive orders on gun control
249. universal background checks
250. requiring registration, licensing, education/testing & liability insurance
251. banning assault weapons
252. gun-free zones
253. closing "gun show loopholes"
254. right to prohibit firearms on one's property
255. temporary confiscation of firearms from individuals under DANCOs
256. guardians' accountability for minors' inappropriate gun access
257. nationwide database of gun ownership
258. hand gun regulation
We oppose:
259. "Stand your ground"
260. open carry
Libertarian Party
1.9 Self-Defense
"The only legitimate use of force is in defense of individual rights—life, liberty, and justly acquired property—against aggression. This right inheres in the individual, who may agree to be aided by any other individual or group. We affirm the individual right recognized by the Second Amendment to keep and bear arms, and oppose the prosecution of individuals for exercising their rights of self-defense. Private property owners should be free to establish their own conditions regarding the presence of personal defense weapons on their own property. We oppose all laws at any level of government restricting, registering, or monitoring the ownership, manufacture, or transfer of firearms or ammunition."
Republican Party of Iowa
"4. We strongly believe in the constitutionally protected natural right of individuals to keep and bear arms, as recognized and protected by the Second Amendment, and we support the repeal of existing laws that infringe upon those rights. We support the addition of “stand your ground” and “castle doctrine” provisions to Iowa law."
Democratic Party of Iowa
Gun Safety
We support:
248. President Obama's executive orders on gun control
249. universal background checks
250. requiring registration, licensing, education/testing & liability insurance
251. banning assault weapons
252. gun-free zones
253. closing "gun show loopholes"
254. right to prohibit firearms on one's property
255. temporary confiscation of firearms from individuals under DANCOs
256. guardians' accountability for minors' inappropriate gun access
257. nationwide database of gun ownership
258. hand gun regulation
We oppose:
259. "Stand your ground"
260. open carry
Sunday, November 13, 2016
Election 2016: The Good, the Bad and the Trumpy
Well, the most contentious election of my lifetime is in the books. Let's take a look at how it affected three political parties.
The Libertarian Party
Governor Gary Johnson received 4,123,115 votes nationwide, or about 3% of the total. That was less than the 5% needed to qualify for public campaign funding assistance, but it was the highest third party presidential vote total since Ross Perot in 1996.
In Iowa, Johnson got 58,796 votes (3.8%). This obviously passed the 2% threshold to secure major party status from the state of Iowa. This will present many advantages to the party. They explain in a recent press release:
“'Voters ask us why they don’t hear about Libertarian candidates until late in an election,' said Campaigns and Elections Chair James Schneider. 'Our candidates have been campaigning for months, but they have not been allowed to file their candidacy papers until August – and often the media and polls do not acknowledge a candidate until papers are filed.' As a Political Party, Libertarians will now be able to file for office before primary elections [in June]."
Besides the presidential race, the party ran Chuck Aldrich for U.S. Senate and Bryan Jack Holder for U.S. Representative District 3. By my unofficial count the Libertarians had 6 candidates for Iowa Senate, 12 candidates for Iowa House and 3 candidates for county offices. There are also 6 Libertarians currently holding office in the state.
The party will continue to grow and build its organization throughout the state in preparation for its first primary election in 2018. If your willing to help, either as a candidate or volunteer, please contact james@lpia.org or keith@lpia.org. Oh, and don't forget to change your voter registration to Libertarian.
The Democrat Party
Going into the final stretch the presidential race appeared to be Hillary Clinton's to lose and lose it she did! Given the high unfavorability ratings of both candidates, I don't think this can be seen so much as an endorsement of Trump as merely a repudiation of Clinton.
Polling from the final days of the campaign showed that most voters thought Trump would be terrible, but Clinton would be slightly worse. Add in the fact that Hillary and the Democrats are quickly becoming personae non gratae in much of flyover country and add months of leaked emails showing that she's corrupt and dishonest and you've got a recipe for electoral defeat.
The Libertarian Party
Governor Gary Johnson |
Governor Gary Johnson received 4,123,115 votes nationwide, or about 3% of the total. That was less than the 5% needed to qualify for public campaign funding assistance, but it was the highest third party presidential vote total since Ross Perot in 1996.
In Iowa, Johnson got 58,796 votes (3.8%). This obviously passed the 2% threshold to secure major party status from the state of Iowa. This will present many advantages to the party. They explain in a recent press release:
“'Voters ask us why they don’t hear about Libertarian candidates until late in an election,' said Campaigns and Elections Chair James Schneider. 'Our candidates have been campaigning for months, but they have not been allowed to file their candidacy papers until August – and often the media and polls do not acknowledge a candidate until papers are filed.' As a Political Party, Libertarians will now be able to file for office before primary elections [in June]."
Besides the presidential race, the party ran Chuck Aldrich for U.S. Senate and Bryan Jack Holder for U.S. Representative District 3. By my unofficial count the Libertarians had 6 candidates for Iowa Senate, 12 candidates for Iowa House and 3 candidates for county offices. There are also 6 Libertarians currently holding office in the state.
The party will continue to grow and build its organization throughout the state in preparation for its first primary election in 2018. If your willing to help, either as a candidate or volunteer, please contact james@lpia.org or keith@lpia.org. Oh, and don't forget to change your voter registration to Libertarian.
The Democrat Party
Going into the final stretch the presidential race appeared to be Hillary Clinton's to lose and lose it she did! Given the high unfavorability ratings of both candidates, I don't think this can be seen so much as an endorsement of Trump as merely a repudiation of Clinton.
Polling from the final days of the campaign showed that most voters thought Trump would be terrible, but Clinton would be slightly worse. Add in the fact that Hillary and the Democrats are quickly becoming personae non gratae in much of flyover country and add months of leaked emails showing that she's corrupt and dishonest and you've got a recipe for electoral defeat.
Obama won Iowa with 822,000 votes in 2012. If Hillary could have held onto those votes she would have beat Trump's 798,000 votes. Instead, Hillary ran off 172,000 Iowa Obama voters and ended the night with 650,000 votes.
Hillary apologists have blamed third parties, FBI director James Comey, the bigoted electorate and other things for Hillary's defeat. But think: Her name was booed during an opening prayer at her own party's convention. People were chanting "Lock her up!" at her own party's convention. If large factions of her own party hate her, why on Earth should independents and cross-over voters line up to support her? If the Democrats had nominated a candidate that wasn't universally reviled, that candidate could have mopped the floor with Donald Trump (who is largely reviled). It's natural for the Democrats to spend some time crying in their beer. But, in the long run, unless they're willing to really examine the shit stains in their own laundry bag they'll probably keep losing big elections.
Before I let go of the Democrats, let me make one final point: The party really needs to get it's mind right on Second Amendment issues. One big reason voters in rural America lean Republican is because of the Democrats' support of gun control. This even helped the Dems lose control of the state senate in Iowa, where Iowa Firearms Coalition's PAC set up a special fund for the sole purpose of flipping that house.
Supporting the right to keep and bear arms needn't be a partisan issue. I recall during a Democrat primary debate, Jim Webb spoke in defense of the Second Amendment. Most of the other Democrats acted like he was from Pluto, except Bernie Sanders from Vermont who at least acknowledged that "the views on gun control in rural states are different than in urban states." (Then Hillary and the DNC torpedoed his campaign.)
Of course Hillary always says she supports the Second Amendment but also supports every imaginable restriction or ban upon gun ownership, so what the hell? Gun owners don't care that she now calls it "common sense gun safety" rather than "gun control." Trump might call it a "romantic interlude" when he's shoving someone down a couch; that doesn't change what it is.
The Republican Party
It was a pretty good election for the GOP despite (or perhaps because of) low voter turnout. Trump took the Whitehouse and the party retained its control of the U.S. House and Senate. While Hillary's numbers were down 172,000 in Iowa compared to Obama's, Trump got 68,000 more votes in Iowa than Romney did in 2012. (Romney: 730,000 Trump: 798,000) The GOP retained the Iowa State House and took over the State Senate. (Republican Terry Branstad still holds the governor's mansion, which was not up for grabs this year.)
A lot of folks are freaking out over Trump's election. I listed some of my problems with him here, namely that he'll ride roughshod over the Constitution and continue to swell the national debt. Also he'll be an aggressive nativist on immigration and totally anti-free trade. If you want a list of his personal faults, flip on a TV.
But there are some rays of hope for libertarians. He's promising a lot of nice-sounding Republicany-type stuff: term limits on Congress, reducing the federal workforce, reducing federal regulation, canceling Obama's unconstitutional executive orders, and perhaps eliminating the federal Department of Education. Ironically, Trump may be less hawkish than his opponent from the supposedly dovish Democrat Party. Lastly, I have fewer visions of my gun being pried from my cold, dead hands under a Trump administration
I'm not too optimistic, but we'll see what happens. Trump is the president; I don't have to like it, but I do have to deal it. Whatever happens it promises to be interesting and entertaining. Buckle up and try to enjoy the ride, folks.
Before I let go of the Democrats, let me make one final point: The party really needs to get it's mind right on Second Amendment issues. One big reason voters in rural America lean Republican is because of the Democrats' support of gun control. This even helped the Dems lose control of the state senate in Iowa, where Iowa Firearms Coalition's PAC set up a special fund for the sole purpose of flipping that house.
Supporting the right to keep and bear arms needn't be a partisan issue. I recall during a Democrat primary debate, Jim Webb spoke in defense of the Second Amendment. Most of the other Democrats acted like he was from Pluto, except Bernie Sanders from Vermont who at least acknowledged that "the views on gun control in rural states are different than in urban states." (Then Hillary and the DNC torpedoed his campaign.)
Of course Hillary always says she supports the Second Amendment but also supports every imaginable restriction or ban upon gun ownership, so what the hell? Gun owners don't care that she now calls it "common sense gun safety" rather than "gun control." Trump might call it a "romantic interlude" when he's shoving someone down a couch; that doesn't change what it is.
The Republican Party
It was a pretty good election for the GOP despite (or perhaps because of) low voter turnout. Trump took the Whitehouse and the party retained its control of the U.S. House and Senate. While Hillary's numbers were down 172,000 in Iowa compared to Obama's, Trump got 68,000 more votes in Iowa than Romney did in 2012. (Romney: 730,000 Trump: 798,000) The GOP retained the Iowa State House and took over the State Senate. (Republican Terry Branstad still holds the governor's mansion, which was not up for grabs this year.)
A lot of folks are freaking out over Trump's election. I listed some of my problems with him here, namely that he'll ride roughshod over the Constitution and continue to swell the national debt. Also he'll be an aggressive nativist on immigration and totally anti-free trade. If you want a list of his personal faults, flip on a TV.
But there are some rays of hope for libertarians. He's promising a lot of nice-sounding Republicany-type stuff: term limits on Congress, reducing the federal workforce, reducing federal regulation, canceling Obama's unconstitutional executive orders, and perhaps eliminating the federal Department of Education. Ironically, Trump may be less hawkish than his opponent from the supposedly dovish Democrat Party. Lastly, I have fewer visions of my gun being pried from my cold, dead hands under a Trump administration
I'm not too optimistic, but we'll see what happens. Trump is the president; I don't have to like it, but I do have to deal it. Whatever happens it promises to be interesting and entertaining. Buckle up and try to enjoy the ride, folks.
Monday, October 17, 2016
Constitutionalists/Fiscal Conservatives: Dump Trump; Vote Johnson!
If you believe in
limited government and strict constitutionalism, as I do, voting for
statist poster child Hillary Clinton is probably a nonstarter. But
you've heard the Republican Party mouth some pretty words about those
principles in the past, so you might feel that voting for their
candidate Donald Trump is your only option. I hope you don't and I
hope you'll consider voting for the Libertarian Party candidate,
Governor Gary Johnson, instead. (No, it's not wasting your vote,
I'll explain why in a minute.) First, why shouldn't you vote for
Trump?
Our $19+ trillion
nation debt is killing us with higher costs of living, slower wage
growth, reduced fiscal flexibility, interest payments eating up more
and more of the federal budget, and is a ticking time bomb. Trump
(like Hillary) would only make it worse. When Clinton proposed $275
billion in new federal infrastructure spending, Trump said he would
double those spending hikes (outbidding his own previous proposal). A
recent analysis said that Trump's tax plan would jack the national
debt up another $7.2 trillion over 10 years. Fiscal conservatism?
And how does Trump
view the Constitution? Last December he vowed that, if elected, he
would sign an executive order mandating the death penalty for cop
killers. Killing a police officer is terrible, to be sure; but that
doesn't give the executive branch authority to create brand new
capital crimes out of whole cloth. Many of us decried Obama's use of
his “pen and phone” to try to circumvent the Constitutional
legislative process. Trump would make Obama look like a piker.
Even though most of
Trump's ideas involve gorilla-stomping all over the Constitution,
constitutionalists are told they MUST vote for Trump because he says
he'll nominate originalist judges who will defend the Constitution.
It seems counter-intuitive to me that Trump would nominate judges
that would thwart his own agenda at every turn. It seems more likely
he will merely lead the party (and the country) further from its
Constitutional moorings.
Someone who knows
plenty about the federal courts and the Constitution is Alan Gura. He
is the litigator who led America's gun owners to victory in two
landmark Second
Amendment cases before the United States
Supreme Court: DC v. Heller
and McDonald v. Chicago.
Here is what Gura thinks about supporting Trump because
of his potential
Supreme Court nominees:
“I have no illusions about what Hillary would do to the
federal bench. Sad! But there is something deeply contradictory about
the notion of electing a power-hungry strongman on the theory that
he'll appoint judges that respect and enforce constitutional limits
on government. Did Hugo Chavez appoint great judges? Did Putin,
Mussolini, or Erdogan? Would it have mattered had they sort-of kinda
suggested that they would?
“As much as I care about the courts, worrying about
jurisprudential doctrine is a luxury for people living under
basically free and stable governments, for people who have access to
food and toilet paper. And absolutely nothing in Trump's history
suggests that he'd honor his proposed judge list or otherwise pick
decent judges, while each of his proclamations indicates that the
Supreme Court would be among the least of our concerns under his
regime. True, the Trump gamble—that he'd be a figurehead who'd
delegate authority to responsible people, or be resisted by the
bureaucracy and media (or, laughably, by that stiffest-spined
creature, the Republican Congress), while hewing to a judicial
selection principle anathema to his personal brand—might
pay off. Should Trump win, I'd at least delight in Hillary's loss,
and fervently hope that he'd prove me wrong on every count. But I
wouldn't bet my country on it.”
What about Governor Gary Johnson? He was a successful entrepreneur
who became a two-term Republican governor of heavily Democrat New
Mexico. During his time in office he vetoed over 750 bills, cut
taxes 14 times (and never raised them), balanced the budget and left
the state with a billion-dollar surplus. His VP candidate, Bill Weld,
was also a two-term Republican governor in a blue state
(Massachusetts). According to the Cato Institute: “Weld cut
spending, balanced the budget, improved the state’s bond rating,
and cut numerous taxes. Even with a Democratic legislature, Weld has
a stunningly successful fiscal record.” Now as Libertarians, the
Johnson/Weld Team would bring those same small government principles
to DC. Johnson has said one of his first priorities would be
submitting a balanced budget to Congress.
So fiscal conservatives and other advocates of limited government
could certainly support Gary Johnson. But since it's nigh on
impossible for a third-party candidate to win, isn't that wasting
your vote? I don't think voting your conscience should ever be
considered a “waste.” If you need more though, how about this:
If we can help Governor Johnson get 2% of the vote here in Iowa then
the Libertarian Party will become officially recognized as a “major
party” by the state. That means Libertarian candidates would no
longer have to waste time and resources gathering signatures in each
race just to get on the ballot. If we can help Governor Johnson get
5% nationally, the party would get similar recognition from the
federal government. This all would mean a more active and competitive
third-party in future elections.
As we know from the private market, competition is a good thing.
With a little competition from a stronger third-party maybe the two
old broke down parties might have to run candidates for high office
that people WANT to vote for, rather than candidates they HAVE TO
vote for. But that will never happen as long as they can reliably
harvest your vote no matter how God-awful their candidates are. Vote
for a change: vote Gary Johnson for president.
Labels:
Bill Weld,
Constitution,
debt,
Donald Trump,
elections,
Gary Johnson
Friday, September 30, 2016
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Post Topics
10 Questions with...
abortion
ACLU
alcohol
Alzheimer's
Ames Straw Poll
armed self defense
assault weapons ban
Audit the Fed
Austin Petersen
Barack Obama
Ben Lange
Beth Cody
Between Two Rivers
Bill Weld
Bob Barr
Bob Cashner
books
Bruce Braley
Bruce Hunter
Candidates
Carl Olsen
Cedar Rapids Gazette
charity
Chet Culver
Christopher Peters
Clel Baudler
communism
Confederate Flag
Constitution
Constitutional Convention
Corey D. Roberts
Crime
Cristina Kinsella
Dan Muhlbauer
debt
Declaration of Independence
Democrat Party
disasters
Donald Trump
drones
drugs
economy
education
elections
Eric Cooper
events
Facebook
Fast and Furious
First Amendment
food freedom
foreign policy
free markets
freedom
Gary Johnson
gay marriage
Glenn Beck
gold
gun control
Gun Owners of America
guns
health care
Hillary Clinton
history
Honey Creek Resort
Iowa
Iowa Caucus
Iowa City
Iowa Firearms Coalition
Iowa First District
Iowa Freedom Report
Iowa Gun Owners
Iowa Right To Life
Jake Porter
Joe Bolkom
John Boehner
John McAfee
John McCain
Judge Napolitano
Keith Laube
Lake Delhi
law
Lee Heib
Lee Hein
liberals
Libertarian Party
libertarianism
marijuana
Me
media
medical marijuana
memes
Memory Walk
Michele Bachmann
military
Mom
Nate Newsome
Nick Taiber
NRA
NSA
Obamacare
police
policy
politics
President Obama
primaries
privacy
property rights
Rand Paul
religion
Republican Party
resistance
Rick Santorum
right to carry
Rob Petsche
Rod Blum
Roger Fritz
Ron Paul
Rush Limbaugh
Ryan Flood
Sandy Hook Massacre
Sarah Palin
Second Amendment
smoking
Social Security
spending
Star Wars
State Defense Forces
Steve King
Steven Lukan
taxes
Tea Party Movement
Tenth Amendment
terrorism
Terry Branstad
Tom Harkin
traffic cams
TSA
TV/Movies
war
Wayne Jerman
weapons
Will Johnson
Yuri N. Maltsev
Zach Wahls